Back in the day, I know I said that I kind of liked when
they played one game a day for a while at the end of the season. I’m not so sure I’m all that jazzed about
having a week-long delay between the Lending Tree Bowl and the National Championship
game. Honestly, college football more or
less fell off the radar for me in that time.
They need to keep the momentum.
My proposal is to have one game a day for 41 straight days. They can make the semi-final games on one day
to cut it down to 40, but we would be I think that would be really fun. It will never happen, but I can dream.
Anyway, LSU won. In
the grand scheme of things, the last game didn’t matter. The top 9 places were going to be the same
regardless of the outcome of this game.
It turned out that the top 17 places all took LSU, so it seems like there
was a correlation, but that doesn’t imply causation. There was a positive correlation between
picking LSU and finishing near the top (.55), but just picking games right
regardless of points was a stronger correlation (.88). If I had more time, I’d figure out picking
what game’s winner had the highest correlation with the final results (My bet
is Texas in the Alamo Bowl, but I’m not sure 100% on that. I could be surprised.
I mentioned a few weeks back that this year was crushing
previous years in terms of the number of points won by not just the top
pickers, but really everyone. Last year,
Mike S. won with 565 points. That would
have been good enough for 40th this season. So, more than half of the field would have
scored more points. That’s a huge
difference, especially considering there was the same number of points at stake
in both years. I can’t really explain that. Maybe everyone is getting better, or there
were fewer upsets, or the games are more predictable (obviously). I really can’t pin in it down. Watch, next year you’ll need 475 points to
win. Strange indeed.
So, here is the final elimination matrix, complete with
final points.
Total
|
1st Place
|
2nd Place
|
3rd Place
|
1.
Jim W.: 713 (-137)
|
1st Place
|
Nevada
|
Indiana
|
2.
Harrell R. #2: 691 (-159)
|
Utah
|
2nd Place
|
So. Miss
|
3.
Pete J. #1: 683 (-167)
|
Utah
|
So. Miss
|
3rd Place
|
4.
Harrell R. #1: 682 (-168)
|
Initial
|
Utah
|
So. Miss
|
5.
Grant F.: 677 (-173)
|
Nevada
|
Nevada
|
Indiana
|
6.
Ben W.: 670 (-180)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Va. Tech
|
7.
Mike S.: 669 (-181)
|
Utah
|
Utah
|
BC
|
8.
Jonathan J.: 668 (-182)
|
Kan. St.
|
Wisconsin
|
Wisconsin
|
9.
Josiah T. #1: 666 (-184)
|
Auburn
|
Baylor
|
Indiana
|
10.
Pete J. #2: 665 (-185)
|
Initial
|
Kan. St.
|
Auburn
|
11.
Hutch H.: 652 (-198)
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
11.
Scott Herd. #2: 652 (-198)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Kan. St.
|
13.
Dave M.: 641 (-209)
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
14.
Brett W.: 640 (-210)
|
Indiana
|
Nevada
|
Nevada
|
15.
Michelle L. #1: 628 (-222)
|
Fla. St.
|
Fla. St.
|
Baylor
|
16.
Emily T.: 625 (-225)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Va. Tech
|
17.
Brian K.: 624 (-226)
|
Initial
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
18.
Mason A.: 620 (-230)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
19.
James P.: 619 (-231)
|
Utah
|
Baylor
|
Baylor
|
20.
Mike N.: 612 (-238)
|
Nevada
|
So. Miss
|
Nevada
|
21.
Peter F.: 607 (-243)
|
Wisconsin
|
Wisconsin
|
Wisconsin
|
21.
Brent S.: 607 (-243)
|
Baylor
|
Nevada
|
Nevada
|
23.
Klei R.: 604 (-246)
|
Baylor
|
Baylor
|
Baylor
|
24.
Andrzej #1: 603 (-247)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Va. Tech
|
25.
Dylan B.: 601 (-249)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Utah
|
26.
Andrzej #2: 600 (-250)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Kan. St.
|
27.
Mike W.: 597 (-253)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
28.
Pete J. #3: 596 (-254)
|
Michigan
|
Michigan
|
Michigan
|
28.
Scott Herd. #1: 596 (-254)
|
Ga. St.
|
Utah
|
Utah
|
30.
Matt N.: 595 (-255)
|
Va. Tech
|
Fla. St.
|
Indiana
|
30.
Josiah T. #2: 595 (-255)
|
Ga. St.
|
Wisconsin
|
Wisconsin
|
32.
Scott Has. #1: 594 (-256)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
33.
Marc R.: 587 (-263)
|
BC
|
Indiana
|
Indiana
|
34.
Josiah T. #3: 581 (-269)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
35.
Adam E.: 575 (-275)
|
Baylor
|
Baylor
|
Nevada
|
36.
Greg McE. - ESPN: 574 (-276)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Utah
|
36.
Damien R. #2: 574 (-276)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
38.
Jay H. #1: 572 (-278)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
39.
Scott Has. #2: 566 (-284)
|
Michigan
|
Michigan
|
Michigan
|
40.
Dustin B.: 565 (-285)
|
Utah
|
Michigan
|
Michigan
|
41.
Shawn M.: 555 (-295)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
42.
Ryan G.: 554 (-296)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
43.
Jay H. #2: 552 (-298)
|
Initial
|
Fla. St.
|
Fla. St.
|
44.
Ryan W.: 551 (-299)
|
Ga. St.
|
Utah
|
Utah
|
45.
Dan Du.: 544 (-306)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
45.
Michelle L. #2: 544 (-306)
|
Baylor
|
Baylor
|
Baylor
|
47.
Jaxon S.: 542 (-308)
|
Va. Tech
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
48.
Cory R.: 541 (-309)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
49.
Max W. #2: 533 (-317)
|
Va. Tech
|
Initial
|
Utah
|
50.
Nick B.: 531 (-319)
|
Michigan
|
Auburn
|
Michigan
|
51.
Mike Smith: 530 (-320)
|
BC
|
BC
|
BC
|
51.
Max A. #2: 530 (-320)
|
Kan. St.
|
Michigan
|
BC
|
53.
Matt M.: 526 (-324)
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
Ga. St.
|
54.
Nikki W.: 523 (-327)
|
Initial
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
55.
Max W. #1: 520 (-330)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
56.
Andrew D.: 512 (-338)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
57.
Tim N.: 510 (-340)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
57.
Brad R.: 510 (-340)
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
59.
Becky H.: 507 (-343)
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
60.
Bryan G.: 501 (-349)
|
Baylor
|
BC
|
Indiana
|
61.
Max A. #1: 495 (-355)
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
Va. Tech
|
62.
Steve Dz.: 464 (-386)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
62.
Nichole W.: 464 (-386)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
64.
Jason S.: 462 (-388)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
65.
Ally H.: 460 (-390)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
66.
Kirt R.: 454 (-396)
|
Fla. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
Kan. St.
|
67.
Damien R. #1: 430 (-420)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Va. Tech
|
68.
Rich P.: 415 (-435)
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Initial
|
Feel free to brag amongst your friends if you wound up
beating them, even if you didn’t finish in the top 3.
Turns out we didn’t need the “only one payout per player”
rule after all, as Harrell finished 2nd and 4th this year. That’s a good thing.
So, we had 6 people pick >=30 games right this
season. That’s a little misleading, because
Harrell was 2 of them and Pete J. was another 2. The other 2 people were Jim W. (obviously)
and Scott Herd. #2. Jim W. was the clear
winner here with a whopping 35/41 games right.
2nd was Harrell R. #2 with 33. I’ve seen bowl pools where they don’t even
bother with the points, they just pick winners that person with the most wins
wins the pool. That would be easier to
administer, and the results (as far as the payout go) would have been exactly
the same – or at least to the same people.
Not sure I like that since the points make the commentary a little more
interesting to write, even if don’t often make a difference.
Speaking of which , the annual award for person that made
the most of their picks was Dustin B. He
only picked 22 games right, but averaged 25.68 points per win, so he was the
person that maxed out their points best.
The flip side of that was Damien R. #1, who also picked 22 games right,
but only averaged 19.55 points per win, and finished in 67th. So, that’s a 27 position swing for two
entries that picked the same number of games right, so maybe the points matter
after all.
That’s it for this year’s pool. I’ll be back in a few months for March
Madness. I’m already excited about
that. I’ve been following the season
pretty close, so hopefully I’ll be able to repeat my success from last
year. Finger’s crossed. Until then, enjoy the college basketball season!!!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeletejoin us on sbobet
ReplyDeleteNice blog helpful good job world update daily
ReplyDeleteWordpress Seo Tips And More
ReplyDeleteThe WordPress search engine optimization plugins listed below are designed that can assist you enhance your web site ranking, but keep in mind — web optimization just isn't a set-it-and-neglect-it digital advertising move. This plugin additionally makes it straightforward to add posts and improves the way in which viewers see them. We love that Wordpress is super customizable with templates that producers can use to offer them the perfect feel and appear for his or her website. Quality web site design is the middle of your online presence and Wordpress plugins make it straightforward to regulate the functionality of your website. This is not a necessity per se, but quite a private preference.
, enter links for all your social profiles and upload your logo within the fb part (used when you share posts/pages with out paintings). Verify your site with Pinterest and enter your Google+ page if you have one. Use them naturally, and do not forget that you should all the time be writing for folks and never search engines like google and yahoo. You ought to write customized SEO titles and meta descriptions which both embody your major page/submit keywords.
It drives me nuts to login to a WordPress dashboard and see a bunch of new feedback on posts, solely to comprehend they’re 99% spam. While that is meant to block spam, some will get by way of.
However, there are additionally web optimization plugins to enhance your images, integrate your web site with external tools like Google Search Console and Google Analytics and rather more. If you provide you with a intelligent or consideration-grabbing title for your weblog submit, by all means, use it. That being mentioned, whether it is long or complicated, and doesn’t embrace the keywords in your submit, you would possibly need to contemplate having an alternate search engine optimization title.
If you are not thinking about discussions in your pages and blog posts, you'll be able to at all times add in a Disable Comments plugin. This setting could seriously wreck your website’s rankings. What that is telling Google and other search engines is you don't want them crawling and indexing your website, or exhibiting it to customers in search outcomes. If you by accident do that and don’t catch it quickly, you possibly can have a hell of a time regaining your misplaced rankings and listed pages.
When you’re establishing and publishing content material on WordPress, you need to ensure Google and different search engines can discover and crawl your website. While Google has claimed there’s only a small benefit to having a keyword in your domain name, research appear to indicate in any other case.
WordPress in particular offers a number of plugins that allow easy enhancing, publishing, and search engine optimization, or SEO. But whereas these plugins are useful, they don’t eliminate the need for human input. With Bruce Clay SEO, content creators can see data from Google Search Console and Analytics inside WordPress.
In a study printed on SearchEngineWatch, it was discovered that sixty three% of the top ranking websites throughout multiple industries make the most of keywords in their domain name. There’s no need to get spammy—just pick a keyword that’s related to your service or trade and use that when potential. It also helps to make your website a little extra memorable. “ChrisBlueWidgets.com” is a bit more memorable than “ChrisGregory.com” if the aim is to sell blue widgets. If you’re a regional/native firm, adding a location to your URL wouldn’t hurt both. https://www.reviewengin.com/5-simple-wordpress-seo-hacks-to-boost-your-google-ranking/
Informative and good blog.
ReplyDeletesports and entertainment
Should Fixing 7 Tips To Write Eye-catching Headline Take 50 Steps? https://www.reviewengin.com/tips-to-write-eye-catching-headline-for-blog/
ReplyDeleteHow To Make More Email Marketing Tools By Doing Less - https://www.reviewengin.com/category/email-marketing/
ReplyDeleteVidmate APK
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteLIVE___ LIVE___ LIVE
You can watch Mayweather vs Logan Paul Live Stream online free 20th Feb 2021 from anywhere Floyd Mayweather vs Logan Paul stream pay per view h2h
what channel is Mayweather fight on
Keep sharing the good articles, check this website for best Mayweather vs Logan Paul
ReplyDelete