Congratulations if you survived the 5-Bowl game extravaganza today. There was one game that went into overtime that I’m guessing absolutely nobody watched and there was a game with some pretty big consequences at the end of the day. I know I mentioned this story before, but my theory on how you win these types of pools is that you try some chances and hope your chances paid off. I think the results of the Orange Bowl tonight were such a chance. It wasn’t the biggest upset of the pool so far. It wasn’t even the biggest upset of the day, but I’m guessing it’s the upset between two teams that people have seen over the course of the season.
Only 13.42% of all points wagered on the Orange Bowl
won. If you happened to be alive and
near the top of the standings, this could be a huge springboard. If you were a middling team in the standings,
it could propel you near the top, and if you were at the bottom, it could maybe
stave off elimination for a few more games.
Winning those types of games is really important. I can remember a really early pool where one
person picked an upset in the Hawaii Bowl.
That upset happened and they wound up winning because of the huge swing
in the points.
I mentioned that the Orange Bowl was not even the biggest
upset of the day. Pittsburgh over UCLA
in the Sun Bowl was an even bigger upset.
It was played while people may still have been at work, and nobody ever
seems to care about the Sun Bowl (even though it has a history of upsets). Still, even fewer points were won in that
game.
If you look at those two games and look at who got points,
they fall into 2 camps. The first camp
are the two people that got the most points (Hurley 357, Quinn 1130). These two entries got 64 and 38 points
respectively over those two games.
However, they were both already eliminated from any payouts, so taking a
risk on those games was a little too late.
Often times, when you see people take risks on games like this, they
also have taken a lot of risks elsewhere that have not paid off. It’s kind of like the person that picks 2
double digit seeds to make the Final 4.
One is kinda nuts, but might happen – and you would for sure be in great
shape if it does. Two in the Final 4
usually means you are going to get killed.
One of those teams is probably going out in the first round and you are
going to lose a ton of points to the field.
It’s kind of a tough strategy to pull off, and I’m not sure the
risk/reward works in your favor.
The next 5 people in terms of points gained in those two
games are all in top 11 in regards to percent chances of winning.
Michelle L. started the day with a 7.25% chance of
winning. After the 34 points in those 2
Bowl games, she now has a 38.48% chance.
Adam E. started the day with a 5.53% chance of winning. After the 30 points in those 2 Bowl games, he
now has a 6.54% chance.
Otis L. started the day with a 0.16% chance of winning. After the 27 points in those 2 Bowl games, he
now has a 1.07% chance.
Brian K. started the day with a 0.75% chance of
winning. After the 26 points in those 2
Bowl games, he now has a 1.18% chance.
Eric K. started the day with a 6.36% chance of winning. After the 25 points in those 2 Bowl games, he
now has a 7.42% chance.
So, it’s not perfect, and to be honest not everyone on the
above list won both games, but they are all still alive and they all improved their
chances today.
Here are the points standings
1. Michelle L.:
555 (-174) |
2. Mark B.: 519
(-203) |
3. Jim W.: 510
(-187) |
4. Pete J. #1:
500 (-236) |
5. Otis L.: 496
(-243) |
6. Brian K.: 495
(-228) |
7. Rich F.: 489
(-237) |
8. Hutch H.: 483
(-261) |
9. Adam E.: 478
(-191) |
10. Pete J. #2:
477 (-259) |
11. Steve D.: 475
(-261) |
12. CAAT 3: 468
(-199) |
13. Scott H. #1:
468 (-236) |
14. Scott H. #2:
467 (-215) |
15. Marc R. #2:
466 (-275) |
16. Dylan B.: 465
(-212) |
17. Emily T.: 464
(-231) |
18. Matt M.: 459
(-218) |
19. Harrell R.
#2: 457 (-260) |
20. Paul K.: 456
(-205) |
21. Andrew Du.:
455 (-196) |
22. Harrell R.
#1: 455 (-262) |
23. Ally H.: 449
(-231) |
24. CAAT 4: 448
(-217) |
25. CAAT 1: 447
(-220) |
26. Eric K.: 446
(-178) |
27. Larry G.: 446
(-236) |
28. Kylar G.: 446
(-288) |
29. Mike N.: 445
(-268) |
30. Mike W.: 432
(-184) |
31. CAAT 5: 431
(-220) |
32. Dan E.: 429
(-210) |
33. Matt N.: 429
(-269) |
34. Marc R. #1:
426 (-206) |
35. Brent E. #2:
423 (-229) |
36. Quinn 1130:
421 (-290) |
37. Kylee T.: 418
(-266) |
38. CAAT 2: 416
(-279) |
39. Jay H. #1:
413 (-256) |
39. Jay H. #2:
413 (-256) |
41. Grant F.: 413
(-285) |
42. Ryan W.: 411
(-228) |
43. Hurley 357:
406 (-264) |
44. Hero R.: 399
(-341) |
45. Brett G.: 395
(-301) |
46. Dan D.: 395
(-302) |
47. Dave M.: 388
(-252) |
48. Vincent W.:
387 (-259) |
49. Brent E. #1:
385 (-267) |
50. Brad R.: 381
(-294) |
51. Brett W.: 379
(-263) |
52. Fr. Guido S.
#1: 367 (-309) |
53. Josiah T.:
361 (-333) |
54. Mason A.: 359
(-248) |
55. Fr. Guido S.
#2: 357 (-369) |
56. Tim N.: 343
(-257) |
57. Dustin B.:
342 (-353) |
58. Peter F.: 339
(-287) |
59. Mike S.: 339
(-300) |
60. Klei R.: 304
(-361) |
61. Becky H.: 299
(-357) |
62. Miela 314:
293 (-396) |
63. Baily T.: 284
(-337) |
64. Jason S.: 212
(-379) |
65. Dennis R.:
193 (-460) |
66. Christa M.:
183 (-405) |
…and the matrix:
Row Labels |
1st Place |
2nd Place |
3rd Place |
Michelle
L. |
38.4766% |
17.5456% |
13.0534% |
Jim
W. |
14.6484% |
14.1276% |
8.5612% |
Mark B. |
9.7656% |
13.1510% |
11.2956% |
Adam E. |
6.5430% |
6.4128% |
7.0964% |
Eric
K. |
7.4219% |
6.9336% |
4.7852% |
Pete
J. #1 |
1.1719% |
4.9805% |
6.2500% |
CAAT
5 |
4.2969% |
3.1250% |
4.7852% |
Mike
W. |
3.8086% |
3.1901% |
4.3620% |
Otis
L. |
1.0742% |
4.2643% |
5.0456% |
CAAT
3 |
1.3672% |
4.3945% |
3.8086% |
Brian K. |
1.1719% |
2.9948% |
3.0924% |
Dylan B. |
Clemson |
2.3438% |
4.8828% |
CAAT
4 |
2.1484% |
2.2461% |
2.5391% |
Andrew
Du. |
2.1484% |
1.2370% |
3.4505% |
Steve
D. |
2.6367% |
1.5625% |
1.5625% |
Paul K. |
1.1719% |
2.0182% |
2.3763% |
Ally
H. |
Clemson |
2.4414% |
2.5391% |
Brent E. #2 |
0.1953% |
1.1719% |
2.0508% |
Pete J. #2 |
0.4883% |
1.0742% |
1.3672% |
Scott H. #2 |
Clemson |
1.8555% |
1.0742% |
Matt
M. |
0.1953% |
0.7813% |
1.7578% |
Dan E. |
0.4883% |
0.8789% |
0.7813% |
Emily T. |
0.1953% |
0.2930% |
1.1719% |
Marc
R. #1 |
0.3906% |
0.3906% |
0.8789% |
Vincent
W. |
Clemson |
0.3906% |
0.4883% |
CAAT
1 |
Initial |
Clemson |
0.4883% |
Kylee
T. |
0.1953% |
Wyoming |
0.2604% |
Mike N. |
So. Car. |
Clemson |
0.1953% |
Tim
N. |
Wyoming |
0.1953% |
Clemson |
Baily
T. |
Syracuse |
Syracuse |
Texas |
Becky
H. |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Brad
R. |
Initial |
Initial |
Oklahoma |
Brent
E. #1 |
Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Texas |
Brett
G. |
Initial |
UCLA |
So. Car. |
Brett
W. |
So. Car. |
So. Car. |
So. Car. |
CAAT
2 |
Initial |
Syracuse |
Texas |
Christa M. |
Syracuse |
Syracuse |
Texas |
Dan
D. |
Wyoming |
Wyoming |
Wyoming |
Dave
M. |
Texas |
UCLA |
UCLA |
Dennis
R. |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Dustin B. |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Fr. Guido S. #1 |
Oklahoma |
UCLA |
UCLA |
Fr.
Guido S. #2 |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Grant
F. |
Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Harrell
R. #1 |
Texas |
NC State |
UCLA |
Harrell
R. #2 |
UCLA |
UCLA |
So. Car. |
Hero R. |
Clemson |
So. Car. |
Clemson |
Hurley
357 |
Texas |
Texas |
NC State |
Hutch
H. |
Initial |
Texas |
Texas |
Jason
S. |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Jay H. #1 |
NC State |
So. Car. |
So. Car. |
Jay
H. #2 |
NC State |
So. Car. |
So. Car. |
Josiah T. |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Klei
R. |
Oklahoma |
NC State |
NC State |
Kylar G. |
Syracuse |
Syracuse |
Oklahoma |
Larry
G. |
UCLA |
Wyoming |
Wyoming |
Marc
R. #2 |
Initial |
NC State |
UCLA |
Mason
A. |
So. Car. |
So. Car. |
So. Car. |
Matt
N. |
Initial |
Syracuse |
Oklahoma |
Miela 314 |
Initial |
Initial |
Initial |
Mike
S. |
Syracuse |
Syracuse |
Texas |
Peter
F. |
Wyoming |
UCLA |
Wyoming |
Quinn
1130 |
Initial |
Initial |
Texas |
Rich
F. |
UCLA |
Clemson |
Clemson |
Ryan W. |
Initial |
Clemson |
Clemson |
Scott H. #1 |
UCLA |
Clemson |
Clemson |
There are 4 games tomorrow, but they did us a favor and
staggered them in a 2-1-1 format.
Therefore, I am going to start with the first two games, and then update
between games.
Music City Bowl
Vegas Line: Iowa -2.5
Median Pick: Kentucky for 1 point
Picks for Iowa: 31 (average pick: 18.16 points)
Picks for Kentucky: 35 (average pick: 18.23 points)
Eliminations if Iowa wins:
Pick |
Points |
|
Andrew
Du. is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Kentucky |
14 |
Brent
E. #2 is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Kentucky |
31 |
CAAT
1 is eliminated from 3rd place contention. |
Kentucky |
1 |
CAAT
4 is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Kentucky |
31 |
Dan
E. is eliminated from 1st, 2nd & 3rd place contention. |
Kentucky |
26 |
Kylee
T. is eliminated from 1st & 3rd place contention. |
Kentucky |
23 |
Matt
M. is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Iowa |
9 |
Mike
W. is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Kentucky |
26 |
Pete
J. #1 is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Kentucky |
21 |
Pete
J. #2 is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Kentucky |
21 |
Vincent
W. is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Kentucky |
26 |
Eliminations if Kentucky wins:
Pick |
Points |
|
Ally
H. is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Iowa |
41 |
Emily
T. is eliminated from 1st, 2nd & 3rd place contention. |
Iowa |
27 |
Marc
R. #1 is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Iowa |
21 |
Mike
N. is eliminated from 3rd place contention. |
Iowa |
28 |
Otis
L. is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Iowa |
14 |
Paul
K. is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Iowa |
19 |
Scott
H. #2 is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Iowa |
17 |
Tim
N. is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Iowa |
29 |
Sugar Bowl
Vegas Line: Alabama -6
Median Pick: Alabama for 29
Picks for Alabama: 55 (average pick: 29.13 points)
Picks for Kansas State: 11 (average pick: 15.09 points)
Eliminations of Alabama wins:
Pick |
Points |
|
CAAT
4 is eliminated from 1st, 2nd & 3rd place contention. |
Kansas State |
30 |
Pete
J. #1 is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Alabama |
2 |
Pete
J. #2 is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
2 |
Eliminations if Kentucky wins:
Pick |
Points |
|
Andrew
Du. is eliminated from 1st place contention. |
Alabama |
27 |
Brent
E. #2 is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
39 |
CAAT
1 is eliminated from 3rd place contention. |
Alabama |
41 |
CAAT
3 is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
41 |
Dan
E. is eliminated from 1st, 2nd & 3rd place contention. |
Alabama |
40 |
Emily
T. is eliminated from 1st, 2nd & 3rd place contention. |
Alabama |
35 |
Kylee
T. is eliminated from 1st & 3rd place contention. |
Alabama |
37 |
Marc
R. #1 is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
22 |
Matt
M. is eliminated from 1st & 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
36 |
Mike
N. is eliminated from 3rd place contention. |
Alabama |
41 |
Scott
H. #2 is eliminated from 2nd & 3rd place contention. |
Alabama |
31 |
Tim
N. is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
30 |
Vincent
W. is eliminated from 2nd place contention. |
Alabama |
40 |
I really love when people have to root against the team they
picked to win to stay alive. It looks
like that is going to happen a few times tomorrow morning. It’s a lot different than the March Madness pool
where the points are fixed for each game.
In that pool, you have to worry about someone else going further than
you. In this, everyone is alive for
points in evert game. It’s just how many
that is the question. That is harder to
know just looking at a table or a bracket.
Well, good luck if you are still alive!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment